1IRW

CYTOCHROME C ISOZYME 1, REDUCED, MUTANT WITH ASN 52 REPLACED BY ALA AND CYS 102 REPLACED BY THR


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Work: 0.183 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Mechanistic and structural contributions of critical surface and internal residues to cytochrome c electron transfer reactivity.

Rafferty, S.P.Guillemette, J.G.Berghuis, A.M.Smith, M.Brayer, G.D.Mauk, A.G.

(1996) Biochemistry 35: 10784-10792

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi960430v

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The influence of mutations in two conserved regions of yeast iso-1-cytochrome c believed to be critical to the mechanism of cytochrome c electron transfer reactions has been investigated. The variants Asn52Ala, Tyr67Phe, Ile75Met, and Thr78Gly involve perturbation of critical hydrogen-bonding interactions with an internal water molecule (Wat166) and have been studied in terms of their electrochemical properties and the kinetics with which they are reduced by Fe(EDTA)2- and oxidized by Co(phen)3(3+). In parallel studies, the Co(phen)3(3+) oxidation kinetics of Tyr, Leu, Ile, Ala, Ser, and Gly variants of the phylogenetically conserved residue Phe82 have been studied and correlated with previous electrochemical and kinetic results. To assist mechanistic interpretation of these results, the three-dimensional structures of the Asn52Ala and Ile75Met ferrocytochrome c variants have been determined. The reduction potentials of the variants modified in the region of Wat166 were at least 33 mV (pH 6, 25 degrees C, and mu = 0.1 M) lower than that of the wild-type protein. Electron transfer reactivity of this family of variants in both the oxidation and reduction reactions was increased as much as 10-fold over that of the wild-type cytochrome. On the other hand, the reactivity of the position-82 variants in both oxidation and reduction depended on the structural characteristics of the oxidation-reduction reagent with which they reacted, and this reactivity was related to the nature of the residue at this position. These findings have been interpreted as demonstrating that the principal influence of modification at position-82 arises from changes in the nature of reactant-protein interaction at the surface of the protein and in maintaining the high reduction potential of the cytochrome while the principal influence of internal modifications near Wat166 results from alteration of the reorganization energy for the oxidation state-linked conformational change defined by crystallographic analysis of the wild-type protein.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
CYTOCHROME C108Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMutation(s): 3 
UniProt
Find proteins for P00044 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c))
Explore P00044 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00044
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00044
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Modified Residues  1 Unique
IDChains TypeFormula2D DiagramParent
M3L
Query on M3L
A
L-PEPTIDE LINKINGC9 H21 N2 O2LYS
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Work: 0.183 
  • Space Group: P 43 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 36.52α = 90
b = 36.52β = 90
c = 137.39γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PROLSQrefinement
IN-HOUSEdata reduction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1997-01-11
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-24
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2017-11-29
    Changes: Derived calculations, Other
  • Version 1.4: 2018-04-18
    Changes: Data collection
  • Version 1.5: 2021-11-03
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations