5SAO

Endothiapepsin in complex with compound FU58-1


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.146 
  • R-Value Work: 0.131 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.132 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Frag4Lead: growing crystallographic fragment hits by catalog using fragment-guided template docking.

Metz, A.Wollenhaupt, J.Glockner, S.Messini, N.Huber, S.Barthel, T.Merabet, A.Gerber, H.D.Heine, A.Klebe, G.Weiss, M.S.

(2021) Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 77: 1168-1182

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798321008196
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    5SAK, 5SAL, 5SAM, 5SAN, 5SAO, 5SAP, 5SAQ, 5SAR, 5SAS, 5SAT

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    In recent years, crystallographic fragment screening has matured into an almost routine experiment at several modern synchrotron sites. The hits of the screening experiment, i.e. small molecules or fragments binding to the target protein, are revealed along with their 3D structural information. Therefore, they can serve as useful starting points for further structure-based hit-to-lead development. However, the progression of fragment hits to tool compounds or even leads is often hampered by a lack of chemical feasibility. As an attractive alternative, compound analogs that embed the fragment hit structurally may be obtained from commercial catalogs. Here, a workflow is reported based on filtering and assessing such potential follow-up compounds by template docking. This means that the crystallographic binding pose was integrated into the docking calculations as a central starting parameter. Subsequently, the candidates are scored on their interactions within the binding pocket. In an initial proof-of-concept study using five starting fragments known to bind to the aspartic protease endothiapepsin, 28 follow-up compounds were selected using the designed workflow and their binding was assessed by crystallography. Ten of these compounds bound to the active site and five of them showed significantly increased affinity in isothermal titration calorimetry of up to single-digit micromolar affinity. Taken together, this strategy is capable of efficiently evolving the initial fragment hits without major synthesis efforts and with full control by X-ray crystallography.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, D-35032 Marburg, Germany.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Endothiapepsin419Cryphonectria parasiticaMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.4.23.22
UniProt
Find proteins for P11838 (Cryphonectria parasitica)
Explore P11838 
Go to UniProtKB:  P11838
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP11838
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.146 
  • R-Value Work: 0.131 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.132 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 45.31α = 90
b = 72.91β = 109.778
c = 52.62γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
XSCALEdata scaling
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
XDSdata reduction
PHASERphasing
Cootmodel building

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
BMBFGermanyFrag2Xtal 05K13RM1 and Frag4Lead 05K16RM1

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2021-09-01
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2021-09-29
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2024-11-20
    Changes: Data collection, Structure summary